Lead Kindly Light - By Averthanus L. D’Souza
GOA, Sept. 16, 2010, 11:00 Hrs (Averthanus L. D’Souza):
The visit
of Pope Benedict XVI to Britain in mid September has a very
special significance for the entire world. The focus of his
visit will be the beatification on September 19th of John Henry
Cardinal Newman, who is acknowledged to be one of Britain’s
most towering intellectuals on par with St. Thomas More, G.K.Chesterton,
Hillaire Belloc, and Ronald Knox. Britain should feel proud
that such an outstanding thinker will be included in the pantheon
of men and women, whom the Catholic Church proposes for emulation
by people all around the world – whether Catholics or
not. Of course, the conferment of the title of Blessed or Saint
is an endorsement of the person’s sanctity – not
his intellectual achievements. In Newman, however, like in St.
Thomas More, the qualities of mind and of personal sanctity
are eminently combined. It is precisely because of this that
Newman stands out in today’s world as a person to be venerated
as well as emulated.
Cardinal
Newman is more relevant today because of the widespread conspiracy
to create a barrier between faith and reason. According to many
popular articles which appear in the Press, and also in many
so-called specialized journals, the argument is proposed that
faith and reason are mutually exclusive and incompatible. It
is said that faith is contrary to reason and is based on blind
acceptance of dogmas which cannot stand the scrutiny of reason.
It is also asserted that those who accept or profess any belief
are irrational and ignorant. According to these arguments any
belief should be rejected which does not pass the test of reason.
It is precisely this kind of flawed reasoning that Newman addressed
in his many writings and sermons. In his most outstanding treatise
on “The Grammar of Assent” Newman showed, quite
conclusively, that reason itself is based on certain assumptions
which are taken as axiomatic. All arguments are based on axioms
or presuppositions which are not established by reason. He goes
on to show that belief is not only not contrary to reason but
is in fact demanded by Reason.
Interestingly
enough, Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan, one of the most eminent
Indian philosophers and statesmen shared Newman’s view
of the mutual relationship between Reason and Faith. In his
widely read book “The Present Crisis of Faith” (Orient
Paperbacks, Delhi 32.) Dr. Radhakrishnan observes that “A
philosopher’s loyalty to reason does not commit him to
the proposition that the nature of Ultimate Reality can be apprehended
only as an object of reason. Many philosophers both in the East
and the West have reached the conclusion that reality is suprarational,
that it is not in its ultimate nature accessible to conceptual
understanding, that religious insights are also genuine revelation
of Ultimate Reality.” (pg.35) He goes on to observe: “Authentic
religion is based on the consciousness of being in direct relationship
with the Supreme. This experience transcends all forms, all
images and concepts. The union is effected in the central self
which is the root of intellect and will alike. All religious
utterances are vain attempts to deal justly with the meaning
of the experience which has been attained.” (pg.36)
John Henry
Newman had the unique distinction of stressing the importance
of the role of the laity in the Church at a time when the laity
were practically relegated to the periphery of the Church’s
life. Newman emphasized the fact of the consensus fidelium in
the process of determining what the Church teaches as demanding
implicit obedience. He gave an elaborate description of the
unwavering loyalty of the faithful to the doctrine of the divinity
of Jesus at the time of the Arian heresy; even when many theologians
and Bishops were in error. In a defence of an article which
appeared in the Rambler, Newman asserted that “the body
of the faithful is one of the witnesses to the fact of the tradition
of revealed doctrine, and because their consensus through Christendom
is the voice of the Infallible Church.” He cites St. Augustine’s
observation that “in matters whereupon the Scripture has
not spoken clearly, the custom of the people of God, or the
institutions of our predecessors, are to be held as law.”
(“On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine”
Geoffrey Chapman, London, 1961, pg.23). Newman was obviously
decades ahead of his contemporaries in the matter of recognizing
the important role of the People of God in the development of
Doctrine. His influence was palpable during the Ecumenical Council,
Vatican II (1962-65). The Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity
– Apostolicam Actuositatem- is indelibly marked by the
insights of Cardinal Newman. Bishop Gordon Wheeler, retired
Bishop of Leeds wrote: “Those of us who took part in Vatican
II became very aware that Newman had not only come into his
own but the whole mind of the Council was imbued with his thought.”
In his reflections on the theologian John Duns Scotus, Pope
Benedict XVI (July 7th 2010) pointed out that valuable theologians
[…] “enriched with their specific thought what the
People of God already believed spontaneously about the Blessed
Virgin, manifested in acts of piety, in the expressions of art
and, in general, in Christian living.” He noted how “faith
in the Immaculate Conception or in the bodily assumption of
the Virgin was already present in the People of Goa, while theology
had not yet found the key to interpret it in the totality of
the doctrine of the faith. Thus the People of God precede theologians
and all this thanks to that supernatural ‘sensus fidei’,
namely, that capacity infused by the Holy Spirit, which qualifies
us to embrace the reality of the faith, with humility of heart
and mind.” Pope Benedict XVI gently invited theologians
to “listen to this source of faith and have the humility
and simplicity of the “little ones.” “In this
sense, the People of God is ‘magisterium that precedes,’
and that later must be deepened and intellectually accepted
by theology.” (Pope Benedict’s address on July 7th
2010 when he spoke of Blessed Duns Scotus at the general audience
in Paul VI Hall.)
Cardinal
Newman who was born in 1801 was described as “that shining
light, and pride of the English race,” came into prominence
as one of the leaders of the Oxford Movement, which endeavoured
to spread Anglo-Catholic ideas in the Church of England. A pamphlet
called Tract 90 published in 1841 in which he tried to reconcile
the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England with the Catholic
doctrine of the Council of Trent, aroused great controversy.
He was received into the Catholic Church on 9th October, 1845
and was ordained priest in Rome in 1847. He was elevated to
the rank of Cardinal by Pope Leo XIII in 1879. He died in 1890.
Preaching at the London Oratory, Cardinal Manning said: “The
history of our land will hereafter record the name of John Henry
Newman among the greatest of our people, as a Confessor for
the Faith.”
Amid the
confusion which is being spread in our times about the sanctity
of life, the sanctity of marriage, the complementarities between
the sexes and the mutual reinforcement afforded by faith and
reason, Cardinal Newman stands out as a beacon of light. We
need to pray: “Lead Kindly Light amid the encircling gloom.
Lead Thou me on. . . .”