Pope’s
Speech and Media – A Reflection
Fr Anthony Charanghat
Mumbai,
Sep. 19, 2006 (cbcisite.com)
Recent media
reports took a few lines out of context of the Pope Benedict
XVI's 8-page lecture on the topic "The Relationship between
Reason and Faith" to theology students and distorted its
true meaning and intent. The media labeling the event as a veiled
attack on Islam was indeed misleading.
The German
Pope's September 12 lecture at the University of Regensburg,
Germany, was trying to explain the relationship between Reason
and Faith. It is typical of Scholastic methodology in discussing
such propositions to consider a variety of opinions only to
arrive at a deep understanding of the truth which it wishes
to establish without affirming or supporting the opinions quoted.
In the format
of such Scholastic methodology, it was necessary for the 79-year-old
leader of the world's 1.1 billion Catholics to make reference
to a quote from a debate between a Christian Byzantine Emperor
Manuel II Paleologus and a learned Persian scholar in 1391 on
Islam. This was one of the historical references of an opinion
that touched upon an issue of his topic. Other opinions too
by Islamic and Christian religious scholars like Ibn Hazn, Duns
Scouts, Augustine and Thomas Aquinas were also referred to without
defending or condemning them.
The media
having obtained a copy of the speech, selectively highlighted
six lines out of context of an eight-page discourse, unwittingly
I presume, making it appear that it was statement made by the
Pope on Islam. This is what stirred up the controversy and evoked
the anger of the Islamic world.
A philosophic-theological
discussion on the topic of Faith and Reason was conducted according
to a methodology of academic discourse understood by Catholic
theology students. But if this is reported to the general audience
who are not initiated into the techniques of such discussions,
it is possible that it may be misunderstood and cause offence,
as it did to Muslims all over the world. This is the reason
the Pope tendered a personal apology, saying that he was deeply
sorry for the offence it had caused the Islamic community. The
statement, constantly being attributed to him, was not his personal
pronouncement but an opinion which he did not support but was
necessitated due the nature of the discourse.
Pope Benedict
has always worked for the unity of religions and after his election
as Pope in April 2005 has reiterated the call for Inter- religious
dialogue and recently a Christian- Islamic dialogue. The media
labeled the controversial lecture was indeed a well- meaning
exercise to bring better understanding between religions by
demonstrating the close relationship between faith and reason.
Catholics have great respect for the teachings of Islam and
have at several occasions underlined the close relationship
between Islam and their own religion.
The Catholic
world appreciates the well -known definition that Jihad according
to Holy Koran essentially means a spiritual struggle or striving.
The Holy Koran clearly states that Jihad primarily means a personal
jihad – a struggle against self for God. Secondly, it
is a verbal jihad – a struggle – a striving against
untruth by always speaking words of truth in the name of Allah.
Finally, it means -physical jihad -the use of violence in defence
of Muslims if they are attacked and cannot relocate themselves
to escape persecution. This defensive nature of physical violence
is frequently lost among a small percentage that uses aggressive
violence in the name of religion.
It is with
regard to the wrong conclusion derived from the rich spiritual
and defensive concept of Jihad that the Pope says that violence
is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the
rational soul. Moreover, the Pope has appreciated the moral
virtues and discipline taught by Islam on various occasions.
Claims are being made that the Pontiff did not mention what
he appreciated of Islam in this particular discourse. It is
not fair to expect the Pope to address all aspects of an opinion
where it does not feature as the main topic of a lecture given
to a specific group of students and not meant for the public
in general.
It is unfortunate
that the media- hype has so portrayed the event that it gave
scope for imputing motives to the Pope and attaching meanings
to his words that did not exist. Pope Benedict was definitely
not trying to draw a wedge between communities but striving
to unite them by his profound reflections calling for faith
and reason to unite so that all religions would lead
to harmony. END
(The writer
is the spokesperson of Archdiocese of Bombay and Director, Catholic
Communication Centre, Mumbai)